Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

The China syndrome

There has been much talk this month about Australia’s over-reliance on the Chinese economy. With two-way trade at A$155 billion, this is hardly surprising.

Put in perspective, trade with China is 2.5 times larger than our second largest trading partner (the US) and greater than the sum of the second, third and fourth largest trading partners. China trade accounts for 23 per cent of all Australia’s two-way trade.

Concerns are centred on China’s vast debt appetite, which surpassed the three-times GDP threshold in the first quarter of this year. So why should this be of concern to Australia? Well, even if China’s is a managed economy, it cannot control the economies of those with whom it relies on trade to support its economic growth.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What drives sovereign debt?

The borrowing of money by governments occurs for two key reasons to make up a limited shortfall in income over outgoings or to stoke productivity. It has traditionally been the latter that has driven China’s borrowings.

China’s overseas investments have also been strategic. Its purchase of US Treasury Bonds, for example, helped improve US liquidity to drive further consumption of Chinese goods. This is debtor finance of the highest order.

But with global debt at 217 trillion—it has reached a staggering 327 percent of total global Gross Domestic Product—it is, therefore, rather a matter of when and not if central banks will have to remove their feet from the borrowing accelerator to the debt brake. And the threat of such austerity measures in countries that trade heavily with China will be a rapid reduction in demand for Chinese goods and a reduction in the income necessary to support its debt.

Of course, China accounts for a vast amount of global debt. In fact, half of all new global debt created since 2005 has been China’s. Meanwhile, it accounted for only 15 per cent of the global economy during the same period.

It should then begin to become clear why global debt matters to us because, when central banks take action to cool rising debt, the first thing they will do is dampening their banks’ enthusiasm to lend by increasing capital reserves and tightening lending policies.

We are seeing these pressures on Australian banks now. These strategies will lead to a credit crunch, which in turn will lead to a reduction in demand. And this is where it hits China hardest. When [rather than if] China’s economy slows, there will also be less demand for raw materials, which account for a vast percentage of Australian exports. China’s economic woes will be felt here quickly by a loss of exports and a loss of corresponding tax dollars, which will have to be found elsewhere through austerity measures or tax increases.

There is also an elephant in the room regarding China’s rising debts: a maturity mismatch between investor-held bonds and China’s long-term debt-funded projects. There is also an economic disparity between local authority bond issues and sovereign debt issues. China’s sovereign bonds should attract higher yields, but often times they do not. The mismatch in maturity cycles is the biggest concern because it means that China’s debt needs are not locked in for long enough to conclude the large infrastructure projects it has embarked on. If its economy suffers, investors will be free to liquidate, leaving the State with unfunded projects. Only 23 per cent of China’s bonds have maturity cycles that match its long-term debt demands.

As a harbinger of concern, Moody's has recently downgraded China for the first time in 30 years, which will undoubtedly increase its global cost of borrowing. This process will continue across the globe, most notably in Europe where failing economies such as Italy, Greece and Spain are located. And, while the growing middle class in China may take up some of the purchase energy required to keep the economic engine running in the short term, that population cannot prevent a rather hard landing in the medium term.

If we see a Chinese sell-off of US bonds to fill the gaps in domestic funding left by exiting Chinese bond holders, then we will know things are very bad.

The China syndrome
Andrew Way, China, syndrome, trade with China
mortgagebusiness

 

Latest News

 A big four bank has announced that its cash earnings will be hit by a further $341 million in remediation costs. ...

The residential property market remains “overvalued” and is approaching a tipping point, an economist has said, despite recent signs of ...

The debate surrounding the efficacy of stamp duty has resurfaced, with the NSW government launching a new review into its revenue system.  ...

FROM THE WEB
podcast

LATEST PODCAST: Transparency around rate cuts

Do you think the mortgage market will see more consolidation this year?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.