Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

'Independence' claims under ASIC scrutiny

ASIC has indicated it will consider prohibiting financial planning firms from calling themselves ‘independently-owned’ unless they meet the Corporations Act definition of independence.

In an email to the Association of Independently Owned Financial Professionals (AIOFP), ASIC senior executive leader Joanna Bird said Section 923A of the Corporations Act currently only protects the words ‘independent’, ‘impartial’ and ‘unbiased’.

Financial planners are prohibited from using these words unless they reject commissions and gifts from product providers and operate without any conflicts of interest.

“In the past, ASIC has taken the view that it will administer s923A on the basis that licensees and their authorised representatives can use the term ‘independently-owned' even if all the conditions in s923A are not met,” Ms Bird said.

“However, given the increasing importance of this issue, we have decided to seek external legal advice.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“If that advice suggests that the use of the term 'independently-owned' can only be used if all the conditions in s923A are met, we will communicate this publicly and to the AIOFP's members, and allow sufficient time for licensees and authorised representatives to amend their websites and documents.”

Speaking to members, AIOFP executive director Peter Johnston said he hopes this topic will be qualified by the group’s national conference in the Gold Coast next month, where Ms Bird will be speaking.

He added that it was legal for advisers to call themselves members of the AIOFP.

“Our previous legal advice has been stating you are a member of the AIOFP has been compliant and does not contravene the Act,” Mr Johnston said.

“An interesting area is where practices are technically ‘independently-owned’ but the advisers are licensed to an institution. [This] is an anomaly that needs to be looked at to avoid further confusing consumers.”

PROMOTED CONTENT


Earlier this month, InvestorDaily sister publication ifa reported that ASIC had penalised Findex for using the words ‘independent’ and ‘non-aligned’ on its website.

A Findex spokesperson later told ifa that the company had only described itself as ‘independently-owned’ and 'non-aligned' in order to convey that its business is majority owned by management and staff, and not by a bank or other financial institution.

[Related: Banks taking 'positive steps' on reforms]

'Independence' claims under ASIC scrutiny
mortgagebusiness

Latest News

Reverse mortgage lenders have accessed a small fraction of the potential retiree housing market in Australia, according to Deloitte. ...

Pepper Money has priced its second I-Prime deal for the year, upsizing the figure to $850 million. ...

The LMI provider has announced a new CFO following the resignation of its current CFO, effective 24 September. ...

Join Australia's most informed brokers

Do you know which lenders are providing brokers and their customers with the best service?

Use this monthly data to make informed decisions about which lenders to use. Simply contribute to the survey and we'll send you the results directly to your inbox - completely free!

How long do you think it should take to discharge a mortgage?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.