Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

Lenders slammed with $730k fine

Following ASIC action, the federal court has fined three lenders a total of $730,000 for engaging in a diamond trading ‘sham’.

The Federal Court last week fined Fast Access Finance Pty Ltd, Fast Access Finance (Beenleigh) Pty Ltd and Fast Access Finance (Burleigh Heads) Pty Ltd (the FAF Companies) for breaching consumer credit laws by engaging in credit activities without holding an Australian credit licence.

The FAF companies operated under a business model where consumers seeking small value loans (of amounts generally ranging from $500 to $2,000) were required to sign documents, which purported to be for the purchase and sale of diamonds in order to obtain a loan.

ASIC alleged in its claim that the purchase and sale of diamonds was a pretence, because there were no diamonds involved in the transaction and consumers had no intention of buying or selling diamonds. Instead, the diamond purchase and sale contracts were designed to camouflage what were in fact loan transactions to which the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (National Credit Act) applied.

The Court concluded that the arrangements for the sale of diamonds “comprised a pretence or sham, brought into existence as a mere piece of machinery, to conceal the true nature of the transaction, which was the provision of credit”.

Advertisement
Advertisement

In handing down the penalty, the Federal Court stated: “Although the excessive interest paid by each customer may not have been large in absolute terms and by some standards, it was no doubt substantial for the customer in question.

“Such customers have little chance of recovering anything from any of the respondents. The most heinous aspect of the case is the deliberate and pre-meditated exploitation of these vulnerable people.”

Deputy chairman Peter Kell commented: “ASIC will continue to crack down on lenders who use avoidance models in an attempt to deprive consumers of these important protections.”

ASIC first commenced proceedings against the FAF companies in 2013, where it alleged that they engaged in unlicensed credit activities, and sought a civil penalties order against them in addition to compensation for five consumers.

[Related: Flex commissions to be banned by ASIC]

PROMOTED CONTENT


Lenders slammed with $730k fine
mortgagebusiness

Are you a new-to-industry broker in the process of growing your business? Then there’s some great news: The Adviser’s New Broker Academy is back in 2021 and will provide you with essential insights into cutting-edge tools, strategies and processes to fast-track to success. Don’t miss your chance to attend. To secure your FREE place, visit newbroker.com.au now!

Latest News

Reverse mortgage lenders have accessed a small fraction of the potential retiree housing market in Australia, according to Deloitte. ...

Pepper Money has priced its second I-Prime deal for the year, upsizing the figure to $850 million. ...

The LMI provider has announced a new CFO following the resignation of its current CFO, effective 24 September. ...

Join Australia's most informed brokers

Do you know which lenders are providing brokers and their customers with the best service?

Use this monthly data to make informed decisions about which lenders to use. Simply contribute to the survey and we'll send you the results directly to your inbox - completely free!

How long do you think it should take to discharge a mortgage?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.