Over the last 12 months, every state and territory has recorded low demand, even in high-performing suburbs, according to CoreLogic’s latest Property Pulse.
Cameron Kusher, research analyst at CoreLogic, said that with this data, it is important to not rely solely on median house prices.
“With such a small fraction of housing actually transacting over a given period, median prices can be biased,” Mr Kusher said.
“Furthermore, median prices may not be reflective of the whole market. When making a comparison between periods, they may compare two very different bundles of housing types and quality.”
Real Estate Institute NSW president John Cunningham said this data should be signalling “warning bells for the housing industry”, which indicates a small number of housing transactions over the last year.
“We know from a variety of property data sources that stock levels are steadily declining and a key reason why the affordability issue presents a bigger picture problem, particularly for Sydney and Melbourne,” Mr Cunningham said.
“When we have stock on market, it keeps the property market competitive and in balance. Without stock, we see less vibrancy and activity across the market and much more buyer competition taking place as opposed to activity between properties.”
He adds the result of this will damage the entire supply and demand chain.
The state or territory with the highest percentage of total houses sold was Tasmania at 5.6 per cent. Following this were NSW, Queensland and South Australia at 5.1 per cent, then the Northern Territory at 4.6 per cent, Victoria at 4.5 per cent, Western Australia at 4 per cent, and the Australian Capital Territory at 3.9 per cent.
Mr Kusher said this low housing turnover is due to several reasons.
“Advertised stock levels remain low across those cities where capital gain conditions are strong. Additionally, high transactional costs, which are based on a percentage of the selling/purchasing price, have become a larger disincentive across those markets where values have shown a material rise.”
Out of the highest performing suburbs for housing turnover, Mr Kusher points out that they have been selling less than half of their stock.
Many the high-performing suburbs currently have, or had, large amounts of new housing stock, such as new housing estates.
“Housing turnover in any given year reflects only a small proportion of the total housing stock. It further highlights that taxes on transactions, such as stamp duty, are heavily reliant on collection from only a small pool of overall housing stock,” Mr Kusher added.
The top five highest performing suburbs in each state and territory for housing turnover in terms of percentage are:
Edmondson Park - 16.1 per cent
Oran Park - 13.0 per cent
Spring Farm - 12.4 per cent
Jordan Springs - 12.4 per cent
Burradoo - 10.9 per cent
Clyde - 17.6 per cent
Wollert - 13.4 per cent
Officer - 11.3 per cent
Brookfield - 10.4 per cent
Armstrong Creek - 9.9 per cent
Caloundra West - 11.6 per cent
Jacob’s Well - 10.7 per cent
Pelican Waters - 10.4 per cent
Birtinya Sunshine - 9.7 per cent
Burnside Sunshine - 9.3 per cent
Lightsview Port - 17.5 per cent
O’Sullivan Beach - 8.6 per cent
Encounter Bay - 8.6 per cent
Middleton - 0 8.4 per cent
Hindmarsh Island - 8.2 per cent
Hilbert - 8.4 per cent
Westminster - 8.2 per cent
Mira Mar - 7.3 per cent
Innaloo - 6.8 per cent
Nollamara - 6.8 per cent
Cygnet - 9.4 per cent
Old Beach - 8.3 per cent
Shearwater Latrobe - 8.0 per cent
Sorell - 7.7 per cent
Spreyton - 7.7 per cent
Zuccoli - 38.5 per cent
Gunn - 5.9 per cent
Jingili - 5.9 per cent
Larapinta - 5.7 per cent
Braitling - 5.3 per cent
Australian Capital Territory
Coombs - 7.5 per cent
Casey - 7.1 per cent
Bonner - 7.0 per cent
Moncrieff - 6.7 per cent
Forde - 6.6 per cent