subscribe to our newsletter

Govt guarantee has driven risky lending: Research

A researcher from the University of Sydney Business School believes that government protection has encouraged the major banks to take risks and drive strong credit growth in recent years.

Dr Eliza Wu, a banking expert and an associate professor at the school’s Discipline of Finance, said that government support has led to excessive lending by the banks, particularly to home buyers and property investors, which has led to high property prices in the major capital cities.

“With government backing, the banks have been able to access more deposit funding, lower their cost of funds, and hence are more inclined to lend in larger volumes and at cheaper rates in order to increase their market share,” Dr Wu said. “This, in turn, has forced other finance providers to follow suit just to remain competitive.

“Under these circumstances, a significant downturn in housing prices could lead to household defaults and widespread losses throughout the banking sector.”

Dr Wu’s research indicates that banks in developed countries like Australia and the United States started taking risks in the aftermath of the GFC when governments offered “a whole vast and unprecedented array” of support.


She argued that governments bought “toxic assets”, injected new capital into the banks and provided liquidity support programs of all kinds.

“There was also a range of implicit and explicit government guarantees benefitting the banks,” Dr Wu said.

She pointed to the Australian government’s decision in November 2008 to introduce a wholesale funding guarantee scheme for Australian banks, which covered their borrowings from creditors internationally.

“Essentially, if the banks were not able to repay that debt, the government was up for the bill.”

While the wholesale funding guarantee no longer exists, Dr Wu pointed to the Financial Claims Scheme, which protects retail deposits up to $250,000, and the Reserve Bank’s emergency liquidity facility as examples of continued government support for Australian banks.


“Then there is the ongoing implicit support for the banks based on the perception that they are ‘too big to fail’,” Dr Wu said. “They hold around 90 per cent of all banking assets in Australia, and despite the recent political tensions between the banks and the state and federal governments, they are viewed as too systemically important to be allowed to collapse.”

Despite their recent behaviour, Dr Wu believes that another financial crisis can be averted if the shareholders demand that the banks retain “larger capital buffers over and above the minimum capital requirements”.

“Our research shows that the banks that are better capitalised seem to do better in that their risk-taking behaviour is more restrained. This comes from shareholders essentially having more skin in the game, so they’re more interested in keeping an eye on what the bank managers are doing and what kind of risky activities they’re engaging in.”

Govt guarantee has driven risky lending: Research

Latest News

Citi is to exit its consumer business, including mortgages, loans, retail banking and credit card operations, in Australia and 12 other ...

The major bank’s CEO has reiterated that responsible lending changes could simplify the lender’s processes and improve mortgage approv...

The non-major has reported growth in housing lending as well as a rise in home loan settlements via the broker channel. ...


Join a group of highly informed brokers.

Broker Pulse, a community-driven knowledge base of lender performance Reveal exactly which lenders are making life easiest for brokers and their clients by taking this monthly survey and joining a group of highly informed brokers who leverage these insights every month.


LATEST PODCAST: Tackling the home deposit challenge

Do you expect to see strong uptake of the HomeBuilder scheme?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.