subscribe to our newsletter
PC chair takes aim at regulators over competition

PC chair takes aim at regulators over competition

“Fierce competition” in the Australian financial system is being “heavily controlled” by regulatory measures that favour stability, Productivity Commission chairman Peter Harris has warned.

Speaking at the ASIC Annual Forum on Tuesday (20 March), Mr Harris reaffirmed the commission’s intent to investigate the impact that regulatory decisions have had on competition in Australia’s financial system.

Backing findings released by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), Mr Harris claimed that stability-centred strategies from regulators have limited the potential for diversity in the sector, making particular reference to the inability for smaller lenders to increase their market share.


“Competition is heavily controlled by the actions of regulators, fierce competition is a risk to stability. This reinforces the market power of the larger banks,” Mr Harris said.

“To improve competitive opportunity, we need… to act at the source, which is the regulator level.

“We surprise some people with our willingness to go and look at the regulators, but they are a substantial force to the degree of competition in the marketplace.”

Mr Harris added: “We are a competition analysis [body], it’s clearly within scope.”

The commissioner claimed that delegating pro-competitive responsibilities to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) would be “wishful thinking”, and it called for the appointment of a “competition champion” to operate within the Council of Financial Regulators charged with ensuring that the market remains competitive.

“The most important conclusion we arrived at is: there is no party charged in this system [to] maintain reasonably competitive market conditions,” the commissioner said.

“There are plenty of parties who’ve got little bits of role in this area. No parties are specifically charged with [that] responsibility.”

Call for increased customer access to mortgage information

Mr Harris also called for the continued “real-time” publication of interest rate information to better inform prospective borrowers.

The chairman reiterated the PC’s draft suggestion that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) collect and publish the data to equip customers with the tools to negotiate a better rate on a loan.

“Consumers need more information — they need more useful information. [We] know the information is collected and available in real time within institutions. [We] know that information is available. It’s not difficult to collect in a world of digital data.

“It could be made available to ASIC to publish a regular series on this.

“Thus, people, when they are choosing to go for a home loan, would at least be informed by what people got last month, or close enough to last month, as close to real time as possible.”

Mr Harris added that the publication of such data would help ensure that banks and brokers work in the best interest of customers.

“[When customers] see [their] broker, it might actually help [their] broker to act in [the customer’s] best interest, because he or she will know you’ve got that information,” Mr Harris noted.

[Related: ‘Meaningless’: PC report slams comparison rates and SVRs]

PC chair takes aim at regulators over competition


Latest News

Westpac and the Commonwealth Bank’s share of the third-party mortgage market has spiked, in contrast to sharp declines from NAB and ANZ, t...

A non-major lender has dropped its fixed mortgage rates, becoming the fourth lender to reprice its offerings over the past two weeks.   ...

The interest lenders earn on mortgages is expected to remain under pressure this year and next, according to Moody’s. ...


LATEST PODCAST: What drops in fixed rates may mean for the mortgage market

Do you think the banking royal commission recommendations could negatively impact competition in the mortgage market?