Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

APRA chair addresses leadership questions

Wayne Byres has addressed concerns about the leadership of APRA, following the release of the APRA Capability Review that flagged shortcomings in APRA’s internal culture, regulatory approach and leadership capability that led to calls for the chairman’s resignation.

On Wednesday (17 July), Treasury released the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s (APRA) Capability Review, in which it provided an assessment of the regulator’s performance and outlined recommendations for reform.   

The capability review was launched earlier this year following the release of the final report of the banking royal commission in February 2019 and sought to assess APRA’s capacity and capability to promote financial stability and its preparedness to address issues raised by the royal commission and “an environment of growing complexity and emerging risks for APRA’s regulated sectors”.

While the review panel applauded APRA’s efforts to build capital requirements, strengthen balance sheets and tighten lending standards in the residential mortgage market in the past few years, several criticisms were laid against the prudential regulator in terms of its internal culture, regulatory approach and leadership and structure.

The main conclusion of the capability review was that APRA’s internal culture and regulatory approach need to change,” the review report reads.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“There is also variability in its leadership capability. There is no doubt that in matters of traditional financial risk, APRA is an impressive and forceful regulator. But the panel observes that APRA’s tolerance for operating beyond quantifiable financial risks has been low.”

According to the review panel, the prudential regulator also “appears to have developed a culture that is unwilling to challenge itself, slow to respond and tentative in addressing issues that do not entail traditional financial risks”.

It concluded: “In combination with APRA’s organisational structure, these factors limit its ability to deliver on the breadth of its mandate and adapt to new challenges.”

Among the 24 recommendations put forward in the review are proposals for APRA to: change its external governance arrangements, alter internal norms by departing from closed-door approaches, reinvigorate its approach to collaboration, take a more forceful approach in its public communications, and consider more “flexibility in its funding and compensation frameworks”.

The panel therefore recommended that the authority consider a new structure as a way to develop a more open-minded culture, one that was adaptable to change and supportive of engagement. 

PROMOTED CONTENT


“A change in organisational structure is more likely to reinforce the required behavioural changes,” it said, suggesting that it separate out banking, insurance and superannuation divisions to increase focus and accountability for dealing with industry-specific issues. 

It also argued for APRA’s chair to relinquish his ADI-specific oversight role and adopt a broader organisation-wide role (with remaining members splitting their roles to include a mix of industry, policy and functional responsibilities) and for a new “competition champion” role to be created within APRA.

Given the findings of the review (and of the banking royal commission before it), Centre Alliance senator Rex Patrick last week called on Mr Byres to resign as APRA chair.

“The royal commission found that APRA was asleep at the wheel and the APRA Capability Review has made findings of ‘variability of leadership, cultural problems, lack of transparency, lack of contestability’,” Mr Patrick said. 

“These are matters that relate to leadership,” the senator added.

“The chair of APRA has been assigned clear responsibility, has authority vested in him by law and must therefore be held accountable for the performance of the organisation. When you earn $886,000, you have to be the best in the game, full stop,” he said.

For far too long, there has been a great reluctance for senior officials in the public sector to accept personal responsibility for the failures of performance and governance by, or within, their organisations.

Ultimately, the buck must stop with someone.”

The senator also suggested that the deputy chairs, John Lonsdale and Helen Rowell, should also “consider their ongoing tenure”. 

Wayne Byres on leadership

Speaking to media about the leadership capability at APRA, Mr Byres said: “So first of all, every organisation has leadership variability... I don’t think were alone in having leadership variability. But we have, over the last couple of years, put a lot of effort into shifting APRA away….[from] a very high emphasis on technical skills and capabilities, and in recent times weve changed our leadership framework, weve changed our promotion process, weve changed our performance and assessment process to try and give a stronger focus to leadership capabilities, behaviours and values and thats a work in progress.”

Mr Byres acknowledged that while the regulator is “not where [it] want[s] to be” on leadership capability, “theres a range of things that weve done to try and improve,” he said.

The APRA chair went on to highlight that APRA had been including more gender diversity in its leadership (with around half of the general managers being women), as well as changing the way it thinks about who it recruits, promote and reward.

“With the government funding that weve got, weve got a great opportunity to build our numbers and bring in more… fresh insights, fresh perspectives,” he said.

“So I think well continue that, but its never going to be something that I think you can say its done, its finished, its just one of those management and leadership challenges that you just have to continually invest in,” Mr Byres commented.

The APRA chair went on to tell journalists: “As a leader of an organisation, I understand as well as anyone these issues around culture, leadership, behaviours, theres no silver bullet here. You need to get a lot of things right to get them effective, and we are like every organisation, we face these challenges. So… we’ve worked hard to deal with those.”

Mr Byres acknowledged that it may be true that some changes of culture may have been slow to change, but that change had been happening nonetheless.

“The report says you know there are aspects of our culture were slow to change, and maybe thats true, but it also, the report also acknowledges its occurring while were pursuing an ambitious change agenda. 

“In recent years, we’ve changed structure, weve changed leadership, weve changed process and activity. So maybe were slow to change, but were also undergoing a lot of change. We are a regulator, there is a premium thats placed on regulators being clear, consistent, persistent. So, you know, maybe theres too much focus on consistency in APRA,” he said.

Mr Byres said that when he was appointed chair five years ago, there were concerns about “inconsistency in decision-making”, so the regulator has “put a lot of effort into sharpening up consistency, making sure there was good collaboration”.

“That may have played out in terms of slower responses; it may have played out in terms of whats seen as encouraging conformity. So, getting that balance right is quite difficult,” he said.

“I dont think any of this in any way should undermine the importance that the role that APRA still plays in getting it right. And, as I said, my view is [that] I understand as well as anyone there are no quick wins here, youve got to do it through hard work.”

[Related: APRA urged to increase supervision outside of mortgages]

APRA chair addresses leadership questions
mortgagebusiness

Are you a new-to-industry broker in the process of growing your business? Then there’s some great news: The Adviser’s New Broker Academy is back in 2021 and will provide you with essential insights into cutting-edge tools, strategies and processes to fast-track to success. Don’t miss your chance to attend. To secure your FREE place, visit newbroker.com.au now!

Annie Kane

Annie Kane is the editor of The Adviser and Mortgage Business.

As well as writing about the Australian broking industry, the mortgage market, financial regulation, fintechs and the wider lending landscape – Annie is also the host of the Elite Broker and In Focus podcasts and The Adviser Live webcasts. 

Contact Annie at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Latest News

The chief of Australia’s largest bank has said lenders should act pre-emptively and shift their floor rates for mortgage serviceability am...

Total household wealth reached a high of $13.4 trillion in the June quarter, primarily due to rising property prices, according to the Aust...

The property exchange settlement platform has been granted approval to establish an Electronic Lodgement Network in the ACT.  ...

Join Australia's most informed brokers

Do you know which lenders are providing brokers and their customers with the best service?

Use this monthly data to make informed decisions about which lenders to use. Simply contribute to the survey and we'll send you the results directly to your inbox - completely free!

How long do you think it should take to discharge a mortgage?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.