subscribe to our newsletter

Former PM questions government-backed loans schemes

A former prime minister has issued a warning over government-backed loans programs introduced in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis.

Former prime minister Kevin Rudd has questioned government-backed lending schemes, introduced as part of a broader stimulus package designed to support the economy amid the ongoing COVID-19 crisis.  

“I say here formally on the public record, let’s be very careful about the implementation of this monumental stimulus package that the government has now announced,” he told the media.

“Frankly, they’re embarking upon loans programs, which have never been embarked upon by the Commonwealth in its history. 

“The implementation of that will be very interesting to monitor overtime.”


Earlier this month, the government announced that it would inject up to $15 billion in funding to support lending to consumers and businesses.

The funds will be supplied to the Australian Office of Financial Management (AOFM), which will invest the capital in wholesale funding markets used by small authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and non-ADI lenders.

The $15-billion capacity would allow the AOFM to support a substantial volume of expected issuance by these lenders over a 12-month period.

The scheme builds on the government’s previous commitments to provide the AOFM with an investment capacity of $15 billion to invest in wholesale funding markets used by small ADI and non-ADI lenders.

The government-back schemes also support the Reserve Bank of Australia’s announcement of a $90-billion term funding facility for ADIs and the banking sector’s commitment to waive SME loan repayments, among other special measures.


Court-approved ban on ‘predatory lending’ welcomed

Meanwhile, the federal government has welcomed the Federal Court’s decision to uphold a ban on what it has described as “predatory lending”.

Earlier this week, the Federal Court handed down its judgement on a dispute between the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and payday lender Cigno regarding the banning of a model of short-term lending used by Cigno.

In September last year, ASIC exercised its product intervention powers to prohibit such lending, which it said caused “significant consumer detriment”.

Cigno unsuccessfully appealed ASIC’s decision, questioning the legitimacy of the legal grounds used to justify the ban.

The federal government has welcomed the Federal Court’s decision, with Minister for Housing and Assistant Treasurer Michael Sukkar stating that the government “will not stand for predatory behaviour by lenders” who “seek to take advantage of Australians”.

“[The] decision is a clear demonstration that the government’s reforms are working to protect consumers,” he said.

“While small amount/short-term credit and consumer leases provide credit to consumers who, in many instances, are unable to access mainstream forms of finance, there is no place for predatory behaviour by these lenders.

“The Morrison government recognises the importance of protecting vulnerable consumers of financial products and if further action is required, we will take it.”

[Related: ABSFEO welcomes non-banks to government SME scheme]

Former PM questions government-backed loans schemes
Former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd

Latest News

The federal Treasurer has expressed concerns at the housing market running hot, but he is not sure if APRA will take further lending interve...

A number of banks see their legally enforceable industry code of practice as a “regulatory burden”, an independent review has found. ...

ASIC has called for firms to persevere as data suggests cyber resilience improved roughly one-tenth of the intended target in two years. ...

Join Australia's most informed brokers

Do you know which lenders are providing brokers and their customers with the best service?

Use this monthly data to make informed decisions about which lenders to use. Simply contribute to the survey and we'll send you the results directly to your inbox - completely free!

Do you think APRA's bank buffer changes will see more borrowers use non-banks?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.