Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

ASIC to review responsible lending guidance

The corporate regulator has revealed that it will review its updated responsible lending guidance after deciding not to take further action in the “wagyu and shiraz” case.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced that it will not appeal the Full Federal Court’s 2-1 decision to uphold Justice Nye Perram’s dismissal of its responsible lending case against Westpac Group, which has since been dubbed the “wagyu and shiraz” case.

ASIC had the option of taking the matter to the High Court but claimed that it is “mindful of the impact of the additional time required to resolve this matter in the current challenging economic circumstances”.

This follows scrutiny from policymakers, which questioned whether a move to take the matter to the High Court would be counterintuitive to ASIC’s aim of addressing uncertainty in the lending space.   

ASIC has revealed that in light of the Full Federal Court’s decision, it will now review its updated regulatory guidance (RG 209) and consider the implications of the Federal Court’s decision on compliance practices.

Advertisement
Advertisement

ASIC issued its new guidance in December 2019, after holding two rounds of public consultation with industry stakeholders. 

The principles-based guidance was designed to provide lenders with greater clarity and flexibility amid uncertainty off the back of scrutiny from the banking royal commission. 

However, ASIC has stressed that prospective reforms of the National Consumer Credit Protection (NCCP) Act to further clarify the enforcement of responsible lending obligations is “ultimately a matter for the federal government and Parliament”.

Background

In September 2018, Westpac admitted to breaches of responsible lending obligations under the National Credit Act, agreeing to pay a $35-million civil penalty.

PROMOTED FEATURES


ASIC and Westpac jointly approached the Federal Court, seeking orders that the bank contravened the responsible lending provisions due to failures of its automated decision system.

The breaches related to Westpac’s home loan assessment process during the period December 2011 and March 2015, during which approximately 260,000 home loans were approved by Westpac’s automated decision system.

ASIC had alleged that for approximately 50,000 home loans, Westpac received but did not use consumers’ actual expense information, which exceeded the Household Expenditure Measure benchmark used by the bank.

It was also alleged that for a further 50,000 home loans, Westpac used the incorrect serviceability process when assessing a consumer’s capacity to repay a home loan upon the expiry of interest-only periods.

The regulator contended that of the 100,000 loans, Westpac should not have automatically approved approximately 10,500 loans.

However, the Federal Court was not convinced that Westpac breached its obligations, with Justice Perram seeking a friend of the court to review the case – reportedly stating that “there is no fact before [him] that any unsuitable loans were made”.

Following his review of the case, Justice Perram judged that in complying with its NCCP obligations, a lender “may do what it wants in the assessment process”.

Justice Perram took the view that a borrower’s living expenses were not necessarily indicative of their future spending behaviour, acknowledging that borrowers would tighten their belts after taking out a home loan.

“I may eat wagyu beef every day, washed down with the finest shiraz, but if I really want my new home, I can make do on much more modest fare.

“Knowing the amount I actually expend on food tells one nothing about what the conceptual minimum is. But it is this conceptual minimum which drives the question of whether I can afford to make the payments on the loan.

“Without additional information, I do not consider that it is possible to accept that the consumer’s declared living expenses tell one anything about their capacity to meet the repayments under the loan.”

[Related: Court weights in on benchmarks, ‘belt-tightening’]

ASIC to review responsible lending guidance
ASIC announces decision on responsible lending appeal
mortgagebusiness

Charbel Kadib

Charbel Kadib is the news editor on the mortgages titles at Momentum Media.

Before joining the team in 2017, Charbel completed internships with public relations agency Fifty Acres, and the Department of Communications and the Arts.

You can email Charbel on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Latest News

The federal government has unveiled a plan to overhaul responsible lending laws by shifting from a “lender beware” model to a “borrowe...

Housing affordability pressures have intensified for first home buyers in five of Australia’s major capitals, who now require more time to...

ASIC has directed fund managers to do more to remain “true to label” after finding that funds labelled as cash had assets other than cas...

FROM THE WEB
podcast

LATEST PODCAST: How lenders are viewing the property price outlook

Do you expect to see strong uptake of the HomeBuilder scheme?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.