Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

Urgent freezing orders issued to property developer

ASIC has obtained urgent interim orders and started court proceedings against a property developer following concerns it was using investor funds for personal use and providing unlicensed financial advice.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced civil proceedings in the Federal Court against Perth-based MKS Property Investments/Developments Pty Ltd (MKS Property) and Paradise Property Group Pty Ltd (Paradise Property), as well as four people related to these companies: Monica Kaur, Sadu Singh, Melvin Paul Singh and Stephanie Lee.

According to the regulator, it is concerned that Ms Kaur had been providing unlicensed financial advice services and that she, together with the other defendants, were involved in “promoting and operating an unregistered managed investment scheme”.

ASIC alleges the defendants raised at least $11.3 million from around 300 investors during the period 1 March 2017 to 22 September 2020 through MKS Property.

It alleges that investors were encouraged to establish a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) and invest part or all of their SMSFs or other funds into property investments and developments set up by MKS Property and/or Paradise Property. These funds were then expected to be pooled together to invest in property development.

Advertisement
Advertisement

ASIC also alleges the defendants used investor funds, at least in part, for their own personal use and to pay returns to investors.

Timeline of the action taken

While ASIC’s investigation is ongoing, earlier this month (16 December), ASIC obtained urgent interim orders to restrain the defendants from removing their assets from Australia, disposing of their property, and freezing monies in their bank accounts.

The orders also prevent Ms Kaur, Mr Singh and Mr Melvin Singh from leaving Australia.

The following day (17 December), ASIC and the Australian Federal Police executed search warrants on a residential premise and business premises.

PROMOTED CONTENT


Last week (22 December 2020), the parties agreed that the asset and travel restraint orders regarding the defendants should continue with slight variation until further order of the court.

“This matter demonstrates ASIC’s readiness to take urgent action to protect superannuation consumers in the current COVID-19 environment,” the regulator said.

It urged anyone with information on the defendants to contact ASIC.

[Related: Former real estate developer found guilty of fraud]

Urgent freezing orders issued to property developer
Urgent freezing orders issued to property developer
mortgagebusiness

If you’re feeling overworked and overwhelmed in this fast-paced mortgage market, it’s time to make some changes, and the Business Accelerator Program can help! Early bird tickets are on sale now. Work smarter, not harder, this year.

Annie Kane

Annie Kane is the editor of The Adviser and Mortgage Business.

As well as writing about the Australian broking industry, the mortgage market, financial regulation, fintechs and the wider lending landscape – Annie is also the host of the Elite Broker and In Focus podcasts and The Adviser Live webcasts. 

Contact Annie at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Latest News

The prudential regulator has written to ADIs to ensure that they are proactively managing lending risks and focusing on lending standards am...

As it waits for APRA to approve its acquisition of MyLife MyFinance, Challenger has flagged plans to expand the bank’s lending remit to co...

Australia has the second-highest mortgage debt as a proportion of GDP among OECD nations, according to a new report. ...

How long do you think it should take to discharge a mortgage?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.