Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Lawyer slams proposed SMSF borrowing ban

Lawyer slams proposed SMSF borrowing ban

A Minter Ellison partner has warned that a blanket ban on SMSF borrowing will re-introduce doubt over investments such as instalment warrants and has urged the government to appropriately identify where true risk lies with LRBAs.

Speaking to Mortgage Business’s sister publication SMSF Adviser, Minter Ellison partner Richard Batten explained the prohibition on borrowing in super was originally lifted to remove uncertainty with instalment warrants.

“There was a concern that while you have an instrument that, in the very general sense of the word, could be seen as a security, it is actually structured under Australian law as a loan,” Mr Batten said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

He stressed the differences in risk exposure between investing in direct property via an LRBA and investing in an instalment warrant.

“We perceive the risk that the inquiry is talking about seems to be more oriented around risks associated with the real property market rather than risks that would be associated with investing in vanilla instalment warrant products,” Mr Batten said.

The recommendation does not seek to distinguish between those two scenarios, a Minter Ellison briefing stated.

“Section 67A is an extension of the original exemption which was inserted to allow super funds to invest in instalment warrants like those offered for example in 'T1' and 'T2' issues of Telstra securities,” the briefing stated.

“It was intended to remove doubt about whether such an investment involved 'borrowing', so removing it will simply reintroduce that doubt.”

Mr Batten said an across-the-board ban on borrowing is therefore “probably not the right way to go”, unless the government consciously takes the view that instalment warrants pose a similar level of systemic risk as borrowing to purchase property.

“If [the government] accept the views of the inquiry around the risks that the inquiry is concerned about in relation to these sorts of arrangements, we would encourage them to make sure that there’s careful consideration given to the other circumstances in which this exemption applies,” Mr Batten said.

 

Lawyer slams proposed SMSF borrowing ban
mortgagebusiness

 

Latest News

The federal opposition has released its response to the final report of the banking royal commission, agreeing to 75 of the 76 recommendatio...

A class action suit has been filed against the major bank for allegedly approving home loans outside serviceability. ...

In its update on the implementation of Commissioner Hayne’s recommendations, the corporate regulator has hinted that it is investigating...

FROM THE WEB

POST RC PANEL DISCUSSION ADDED

podcast

LATEST PODCAST: The current mindset of the mortgage industry

Is enough being done to ensure responsible lending?