Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

Baldwin slams Grattan Institute over negative gearing claims

RE/MAX WA managing director Geoff Baldwin has issued a strong response to the 2013 report by the Grattan Institute after it was revisited yesterday following news of Australia’s housing affordability.

Mr Baldwin argued that suggestions by the Grattan Institute that negative gearing should be abolished, that the family home should be subject to capital gains tax, and that land tax should also apply to the family home are “recipes for disaster not only for property owners but also for renters”.

“When the Keating Government abolished negative gearing in the 1980s, investors fled the market, rents skyrocketed and the whole market suffered, not least tenants, with the result that it was reintroduced within two years,” he said.

“Winding back negative gearing in the naive belief that it will assist first home buyers neglects to take into account that investors provide around 80 per cent of rental accommodation in Australia and that no government has the funds or the inclination to go back to providing 1960s-style government housing estates.”

The Grattan Institute's suggestion that planning processes need to be streamlined and simplified makes sense, said Mr Baldwin. However, he argued that the report draws “a very long bow” to suggest that this will make it easier for first home buyers to live close to the city.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“On the other hand, meddling with the last bastion of individual security – the family home – with some vague conception that it will assist first home buyers, is fanciful at best and if taken seriously, very worrying for home owners,” he said.

“The last thing current or future home owners would want to see happen is governments viewing the family home as a potential cash cow.”

Mr Baldwin said it is “very obvious” that the authors of the Grattan report were slanted towards justifying a particular outcome rather than providing a well-researched and rational study.

“There is no doubt that assistance for first home buyers is justified but attempting to harm current home owners and investors, devaluing their assets by changing negative gearing rules or by introducing taxes on their properties should not be considered seriously,” he said.

Baldwin slams Grattan Institute over negative gea

PROMOTED CONTENT


>Mr Baldwin argued that suggestions by the Grattan Institute that negative gearing should be abolished, that the family home should be subject to capital gains tax, and that land tax should also apply to the family home are “recipes for disaster not only for property owners but also for renters”.

“When the Keating Government abolished negative gearing in the 1980s, investors fled the market, rents skyrocketed and the whole market suffered, not least tenants, with the result that it was reintroduced within two years,” he said.

“Winding back negative gearing in the naive belief that it will assist first home buyers neglects to take into account that investors provide around 80 per cent of rental accommodation in Australia and that no government has the funds or the inclination to go back to providing 1960s-style government housing estates.”

The Grattan Institute's suggestion that planning processes need to be streamlined and simplified makes sense, said Mr Baldwin. However, he argued that the report draws “a very long bow” to suggest that this will make it easier for first home buyers to live close to the city.

“On the other hand, meddling with the last bastion of individual security – the family home – with some vague conception that it will assist first home buyers, is fanciful at best and if taken seriously, very worrying for home owners,” he said.

“The last thing current or future home owners would want to see happen is governments viewing the family home as a potential cash cow.”

Mr Baldwin said it is “very obvious” that the authors of the Grattan report were slanted towards justifying a particular outcome rather than providing a well-researched and rational study.

“There is no doubt that assistance for first home buyers is justified but attempting to harm current home owners and investors, devaluing their assets by changing negative gearing rules or by introducing taxes on their properties should not be considered seriously,” he said.

Baldwin slams Grattan Institute over negative gearing claims
mortgagebusiness

Latest News

Providing more efficient loan approvals is “within the control of the lenders” and does not require changes to the law, according to Mon...

The chief executive of CBA has called for more regulation for the buy now, pay later market, outlining that some players have now outgrown ...

NAB chief executive Ross McEwan has urged state governments to speed up the development of land for residential construction to ease pressu...

FROM THE WEB

Join a group of highly informed brokers.

Broker Pulse, a community-driven knowledge base of lender performance Reveal exactly which lenders are making life easiest for brokers and their clients by taking this monthly survey and joining a group of highly informed brokers who leverage these insights every month.

JOIN NOW
podcast

LATEST PODCAST: Citi’s exit and bank turnaround time disparities

Do you expect to see strong uptake of the HomeBuilder scheme?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.