Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
subscribe to our newsletter

Risks flagged as banks exit SMSF lending

Further exits by ADIs from the SMSF lending space could see “an influx of mezzanine lenders” that may result in higher interest rates for loans and greater risks for trustees, the SMSF Association has warned.

SMSF Association director of technical and professional standards Graeme Colley explained that the tougher prudential controls imposed on banks by APRA is seeing banks tightening up on their lending policies for SMSFs.

“Through these bank restrictions on loans, the market may tighten up and restrict it,” he said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“I think the complexity of [LRBAs] is one reason the banks [in some cases] have gotten out of it and the other reason is APRA tightening up on the lending criteria – that’s why we’ve seen CBA and Westpac increase interest rates.”

If all the banks and larger institutions leave the SMSF space, Mr Colley says this could mean “an influx of mezzanine lenders” that is likely to result in loans with higher interest rates and greater risks.

“The first [risk] is higher interest rates which could [require] greater security or a higher level of deposits from a superannuation fund so the greater security may be the other assets owned by members,” he said.

“The superannuation fund may have to make a greater deposit on the investment and that will mean dedicating more of its assets for the purchase of the property.”

In situations where the investment in the property goes bad, Mr Colley said this could be a problem because it will mean the deposit put forward by the super fund is partially lost because of the loan transaction.

“That’s something David Murray raised; he said that with LRBAs the risk is with the superannuation fund because the superannuation fund puts the money in and banks tie everything up and they’re going to ensure they get their money back,” he said.

“So if the investment goes bad, the super fund loses out.”

The federal government recently announced that it did not agree with the Financial System Inquiry’s recommendation to prohibit limited recourse borrowing arrangements by SMSFs – the only one of the 44 recommendations not accepted.

FBAA chief executive Peter White said he agrees with the federal government’s stance on SMSF lending because the volume is not enough to cause concern and warrant intervention.

“In reality, the level of activity with borrowing has been small in the overall context of total assets inside the SMSF and broader superannuation sectors,” he said.

Risks flagged as banks exit SMSF lending
mortgagebusiness

Latest News

A major insurance provider has announced that it would restrict its offering of lender’s mortgage insurance in light of emerging risks ass...

Lenders will be allowed to extend their pre-approval period for borrowers using the First Home Loan Deposit Scheme given the coronavirus pan...

The federal government has announced several changes to the Takeovers Panel, which include the reappointment of an ANZ executive and the ap...

FROM THE WEB
podcast

LATEST PODCAST: Further relief for SMEs and borrowers

Do you expect COVID-19 to reduce or increase your business flows?

Why we’ll keep delivering for our communities in the face of COVID-19

alex

As Australia tries to keep pace with a rapidly changing business and social landscape in the wake of COVID-19, Momentum Media is leading the way delivering essential content to our communities, writes Alex Whitlock, director of Mortgage Business.

Read more

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.