Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

APRA stands by risk modelling

Risk modelling may have gone from the “penthouse to the doghouse” in the wake of the global financial crisis, but APRA chairman Wayne Byres continues to support the practice.

Speaking at a Global Risk Forum in Hong Kong recently, Mr Byres posed the question “To model or not to model?” to an audience of global regulators.

Mr Byres noted that the evolution of the Basel framework has followed in the footsteps of a financial services industry that is employing “greater sophistication and science in the measurement of risk”.

“The use of internal models was introduced into the Basel framework for market risk in 1996, opening the door to the use of credit and operational risk models a decade later in Basel II. At this point, models reigned supreme, and were seen as the regulatory future,” he said.

“Regulators even calibrated the framework to provide significant incentives for banks to invest in models for regulatory purposes, given they were seen to be at the heart of advanced risk management.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

But soon after models reached their pinnacle, the global financial crisis rocked global stock markets, Mr Byres said.

“Discussion quickly turned from a future built on models, to their failure: models went, to put it simply, from the penthouse to the doghouse.

“Regulators’ reliance on advanced risk models – coupled with capital concessions for banks for building them – all of a sudden seemed a questionable strategy,” he said, adding that models were being accused of being too complex.

However, Mr Byres rejected the argument that Basel II and its focus on modelling sent the global regulatory community in “the wrong direction”.

“Seeking to improve the risk sensitivity of Basel I was a necessary and entirely sensible objective,” he said.

PROMOTED CONTENT


“What we might now reflect on, and which I hope we might explore tomorrow, is whether we were seduced by the science, and embraced complexity without sufficient regard to other objectives such as transparency and comparability.”

While Mr Byres said he supports the use of internal models, there needs to be a stronger set of constraints, more consistency in modelling practices, a greater degree of conservatism and “a recognition that some risks are beyond the ability of even the most clever quants to reliably measure”.

APRA stands by risk modelling
mortgagebusiness

Latest News

The big four bank has confirmed that it is rolling out a new program of work to increase the speed in which it provides unconditional approv...

The ASBFEO has called on government to fund a revenue-contingent loan scheme for SMEs to help them manage cash flow once support measures en...

The fintech’s debit card and pay facilities will come offline today following the neobank’s decision to exit the banking business. ...

FROM THE WEB

Join a group of highly informed brokers.

Broker Pulse, a community-driven knowledge base of lender performance Reveal exactly which lenders are making life easiest for brokers and their clients by taking this monthly survey and joining a group of highly informed brokers who leverage these insights every month.

JOIN NOW
podcast

LATEST PODCAST: A new mortgage lender enters the fray

Do you expect to see strong uptake of the HomeBuilder scheme?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.