Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
subscribe to our newsletter

APRA stands by risk modelling

Risk modelling may have gone from the “penthouse to the doghouse” in the wake of the global financial crisis, but APRA chairman Wayne Byres continues to support the practice.

Speaking at a Global Risk Forum in Hong Kong recently, Mr Byres posed the question “To model or not to model?” to an audience of global regulators.

Mr Byres noted that the evolution of the Basel framework has followed in the footsteps of a financial services industry that is employing “greater sophistication and science in the measurement of risk”.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“The use of internal models was introduced into the Basel framework for market risk in 1996, opening the door to the use of credit and operational risk models a decade later in Basel II. At this point, models reigned supreme, and were seen as the regulatory future,” he said.

“Regulators even calibrated the framework to provide significant incentives for banks to invest in models for regulatory purposes, given they were seen to be at the heart of advanced risk management.”

But soon after models reached their pinnacle, the global financial crisis rocked global stock markets, Mr Byres said.

“Discussion quickly turned from a future built on models, to their failure: models went, to put it simply, from the penthouse to the doghouse.

“Regulators’ reliance on advanced risk models – coupled with capital concessions for banks for building them – all of a sudden seemed a questionable strategy,” he said, adding that models were being accused of being too complex.

However, Mr Byres rejected the argument that Basel II and its focus on modelling sent the global regulatory community in “the wrong direction”.

“Seeking to improve the risk sensitivity of Basel I was a necessary and entirely sensible objective,” he said.

“What we might now reflect on, and which I hope we might explore tomorrow, is whether we were seduced by the science, and embraced complexity without sufficient regard to other objectives such as transparency and comparability.”

While Mr Byres said he supports the use of internal models, there needs to be a stronger set of constraints, more consistency in modelling practices, a greater degree of conservatism and “a recognition that some risks are beyond the ability of even the most clever quants to reliably measure”.

APRA stands by risk modelling
mortgagebusiness

Latest News

New APRA data has revealed that ANZ was the only big four bank to record negative home lending growth before the coronavirus outbreak altere...

The rapid move to support digital mortgages amid the coronavirus pandemic “will have a dramatic effect” on how people will transact on m...

Mortgage holders will be breathing a “sigh of relief” following the federal government’s announcement of a new $130-billion support p...

FROM THE WEB
podcast

LATEST PODCAST: Further relief for SMEs and borrowers

Do you think Australia will move to quantitative easing this year?

Why we’ll keep delivering for our communities in the face of COVID-19

alex

As Australia tries to keep pace with a rapidly changing business and social landscape in the wake of COVID-19, Momentum Media is leading the way delivering essential content to our communities, writes Alex Whitlock, director of Mortgage Business.

Read more

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.