Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
realestatebusiness logo

Subscribe to our newsletter

ASIC seeks feedback on new complaints handling rules

The corporate regulator is seeking feedback on its newly-proposed internal dispute resolution rules on how financial services firms should handle customer complaints, including those on social media.

Financial institutions may have to accept grievances aired online (for example, on social media platforms) as legitimate customer complaints under the new internet dispute resolution (IDR) rules being proposed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

All ASIC-regulated financial firms are required by legislation to have an IDR system that meets the corporate regulator’s standards. However, the corporate watchdog’s deputy chair Karen Chester noted that “there is room for much improvement when it comes to handling consumer complaints” in the financial services industry.

“The Ramsay Panel Review, recent ASIC research, case studies before the financial services royal commission and our own supervisory work have all identified shortcomings in consumer complaints handling,” Ms Chester said.

“Consumers expect and need a fair, timely and effective way to have their complaints dealt with, and to be provided redress where appropriate. The absence of such effective redress, and the failure of firms to identify and look into systemic complaints, were key findings of the [financial services royal commission] and the prudential inquiry into the [Commonwealth Bank of Australia].”

Advertisement
Advertisement

The regulator has, therefore, released new proposed standards for public consultation in a bid to  make the complaints handling performance of financial firms transparent.

ASIC’s proposed updates to Regulatory Guide 165 include:

  • updating the definition “complaint” to that stipulated in AS/NZS 10002:2014: “[An expression] of dissatisfaction made to or about an organization, related to its products, services, staff or the handling of a complaint, where a response or resolution is explicitly or implicitly expected or legally required.”;
  • amending the definition of “small business” in the Corporations Act to align with the definition in the AFCA rules;
  • requiring financial firms to record a unique identifier or case reference number and prescribed data set for all complaints received, including those that are resolved to a complainant’s satisfaction at the first point of contact;
  • requiring financial firms to report IDR data to ASIC at half-yearly intervals;
  • publishing IDR data at both aggregate and firm levels;
  • reducing maximum timeframes for providing IDR responses from 90 days to 45 days for superannuation complaints, and from 45 days to 30 days for all other complaints (excluding those pertaining to hardship notices, default notices, and requests to postpone enforcement proceedings), with IDR delay notifications applicable only in exceptional circumstances;
  • introducing new requirements on financial firms regarding systemic issue identification, escalation, and analysis, such as boards to set clear accountabilities for complaints handling functions, staff that deal with disputes to consider whether complaints involve potentially systemic issues, staff to escalate possible system issues for action, and staff to follow up on escalations and report them in a timely manner, among others; and
  • requiring customer advocates to also comply with RG 165.

ASIC said the proposed new standards and data reporting requirements would “continue to forge the effective relationship between IDR and the work of [the Australian Financial Complaints Authority]”.

“Firm performance in how they handle customer complaints, and their interaction with AFCA, will increasingly be in plain sight. This greater transparency will inform consumer and broader public understanding of how well firms treat their customers,” Ms Chester said.

“For a regulator, it also provides an invaluable insight into how non-financial risks are being managed by the firm and ultimately the board. ASIC expects greater investment and attention by boards to their own internal customer complaints data and complaints handling performance.”

Feedback to ASIC’s proposed IDR rules is to be provided by 9 August 2019, with the corporate regulator aiming to publish the new standards in its updated RG 165 by the end of 2019.

Additionally, the regulator said a separate consultation on the publication of IDR data will be launched in early 2020.

[Related: ASIC concerned over IDR 'obstacles' in financial sector]

ASIC seeks feedback on new complaints handling rules
mortgagebusiness

Tas Bindi

Tas Bindi is the features editor on the mortgage titles and writes about the mortgage industry, macroeconomics, fintech, financial regulation, and market trends.  

Prior to joining Momentum Media, Tas wrote for business and technology titles such as ZDNet, TechRepublic, Startup Daily, and Dynamic Business. 

You can email Tas on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

 

Latest News

The major bank has said that a change in government did not currently necessitate a change to its economic forecast nor its interest rate ex...

The new federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers has set out Labor’s first priorities for the “tricky” economy. ...

The major banking group has confirmed that its acting head of mortgage technology has accepted a long-term position. ...

VIEW ALL

Join Australia's most informed brokers

Do you know which lenders are providing brokers and their customers with the best service?

Use this monthly data to make informed decisions about which lenders to use. Simply contribute to the survey and we'll send you the results directly to your inbox - completely free!

What is the maximum proportion of income borrowers should use to service a mortgage?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.